
Why does a milking stool have only three legs? Because the cow has
the udder.
The race for the office of PRESIDENT of THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA is exponentially different this time around. The RED Candidates are extolling their worths with the candor of PENN and TELLER.( One talks a “blue” streak, the other has “nothing” to say.= Gingrich vs Romney/ wives vs taxes.) In order for them to roust those that believe in America the “PURITAN standard” the story told should have the following…
Aristotle’s Appeals . . .
The goal of argumentative writing is to persuade your audience that your ideas are valid, or more valid than someone else’s. The Greek philosopher Aristotle divided the means of persuasion, appeals, into three categories–Ethos, Pathos, Logos.
Ethos (Credibility), or ethical appeal, means convincing by the character of the author. We tend to believe people whom we respect. One of the central problems of argumentation is to project an impression to the reader that you are someone worth listening to, in other words making yourself as author into an authority on the subject of the paper, as well as someone who is likable and worthy of respect.
Pathos (Emotional) means persuading by appealing to the reader’s emotions. We can look at texts ranging from classic essays to contemporary advertisements to see how pathos, emotional appeals, are used to persuade. Language choice affects the audience’s emotional response, and emotional appeal can effectively be used to enhance an argument.
Logos (Logical) means persuading by the use of reasoning. This will be the most important technique we will study, and Aristotle’s favorite. We’ll look at deductive and inductive reasoning, and discuss what makes an effective, persuasive reason to back up your claims. Giving reasons is the heart of argumentation, and cannot be emphasized enough. We’ll study the types of support you can use to substantiate your thesis, and look at some of the common logical fallacies, in order to avoid them in your writing….
In following these three ‘rules of engagement’ it seems that the FOUR still wasting fuel State-by-State have been “MILKING” the gullibilities of those with ideals that are more “SETTLED FOR” than demanded. I WILL NOT go into a diatribe of MY misinformations of those seeking office through an entity not of my positivity. Nor will I accept the similar from those that I DO hold a modicum of hope.
The joke beginning this post is “serious”. The BOVINE “race” has provided much to civilization, parts of speech= ‘Bull “manure”, NOUNS. Foods= Steak, Hamburger, Cheese. Art products= Glues. Clothing= Leather: pants, shoes etc. The “getting” of the various items is an old profession, older than the “one” that most politicians claim they’re “above”.
To bring this to a gracious end I’ll assume that you have an “idea” of the basics of the extraction of the DAIRY Cow’s gift of liquid sustenance, not through the modern mechanized manner but of the ancient MANUAL- DIGITAL,( the human hand type.).With the four “playing musical chairs” throughout the past few events in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina… soon to be played in Florida, the “game” would have an added value if while they were “MILKING” their constituents that the stool were turned 180 degrees, so that upon the next “event” the winners would find themselves in a similar position they’re placing their voters. The voter could then peruse the candidates’ abilities like a LAZY SUSAN.
This is not without historical president…The term is CHAMFER, NOT to be confused with CAMPHOR, (Camphor is a waxy, white or transparent solid with a strong, aromatic odor. It is a terpenoid with the chemical formula C10H16O. It is found in wood of the camphor laurel ).
CHAMFER=
A late 19th century Victorian game which used a traditional three legged milking stool. The stool would be turned upside down and the three contestants would have to see whom could sit on the upturned stool the best, the winner being the person who managed the most anal penetration. In the early years of this game the ‘world’ champion was a Scottish man called Chamfer, hence the title of the game.
Wouldn’t THAT make the POLE-IT-I-CALL process more truthfull?
By the use of a “simple tool” the PATHOS would be very evident due to the participant’s ETHOS, evident by how much LOGOS is endured for the office.
A “THING”or ‘DECISION” OUR choice.




…


… instead of like this…
…

